HARLEY DAVIDSON CASE
PROBLEM
STATEMENT: Harley Davidson’s stock fell from $36 to $34 (5% decline) a share on
news of declining profits & sales. We need to find out what’s going on and
how to fix it while maintaining market share. (P&L CASE)
DATA
POINTS:
- Harley lost 2% market share at a span of 3 years
- market share is measured in units not dollars
- Harley’s revenue dropped 8% last year
- 3 yr ago = profits down by 5%
- 2 yr ago = profits down by 8%
- 1 yr ago = profits down by 6%
What Constitutes Success (WCS): Stop
the downfall, 5% increase every year for the next 5 years.
FRAMEWORK: E(P=R-C)M
where E=external
conditions, P=profit, R=revenue, C=costs, M=market conditions.
EXTERNAL CONDITIONS
- US unemployment low
- US dollar fairly weak against Asian currencies, strong in Europe
- Interest rates are low
- Corona virus had an effect on production & sales in China
- Reasonable gas price in US
· INDUSTRY INFORMATION:
- Last year industry grew by 5%
- Harley shrunk by 6%
- Small, less expensive scooters grew by 8%
- Female riders were up by 12% (10% of overall motorcycle riders, but only 2% of Harley’s riders)
- Harley has only one model Harley Hog
- Market leaders:
Honda | 27 |
Harley | 24 |
Yamaha | 17 |
Suzuki | 10 |
Kawasaki | 8 |
BMW | 6 |
Vespa, Suzuki (scooter co) | 9 |
INFERENCE:
It’s a Harley problem because:
- Current customer base is ageing out
- Has few female riders
- Current trend is headed towards smaller, lighter, more gas efficient bikes
MAJOR
REVENUE STREAMS OF HARLEY
REVENUE STREAMS |
Y1 (%) |
Y2 (%) |
Domestic motorcycle sales |
45 |
35 |
International motorcycle sales |
40 |
40 |
Replacement parts |
10 |
15 |
Garb merchandise |
5 |
10 |
INFERENCE: Harley’s
customer base is investing less in newer bikes, fixing old bikes and buying
garbs as accessories.
COST
ANALYSIS
· Cost of steel likely to fluctuate, as a steel contract
shall expire in 24 months, steel costs are likely to increase in 24 months
SHORT TERM
STRATEGIES (18 MONTHS >)
REVENUE BASED |
COST BASED |
|
|
3
SITUATIONS ON PRICE CHANGE:
SITUATION |
PRICE |
NO. OF MOTORCYCLE |
NET PROFIT (EACH) ($) |
NET PROFIT ($) |
I |
Same |
330,000 |
10,000 |
3.3 billion |
II |
Discount |
440,000 |
7,000 |
3.08 billion |
III |
Raise |
275,000 |
12,000 |
3.3 billion |
WHICH
OPTION IS BEST?
OPTION
I (Best)
We
should keep the price same because market share was a key objective and if we
raise the price we are going to sell 55,000 fewer bikes that’s about a 17% drop
which will probably lower our market share. By selling more bikes we can sell
more garb and eventually more replacement parts.
OPTION
II (impossible to achieve in a short span of 18 months.)
- If we raise the price, we will have lower labor cost because we will be able to lay off people.
- The higher price will enhance the brand.
- International distribution channels where the dollar is still weak, any extra inventory can be shipped overseas and sold at new higher price.
- Garb sales tend to be higher when you enter a new territory, so market share won’t be an issue.
2 LONG TERM REVENUE BASED STRATEGY
- New bike not only geared towards women but also younger man, mostly electric bike.
- Acquire a scooter company.
2 LONG TERM COST BASED STRATEGY
- Buy steel futures to hedge against a steel increase.
- Stockpile some steel at current price.
- Make more parts from composites instead of steel.
- Modernize plants with new tech and increase production operations overseas.
- Manufacture bikes in Asia.
CASE
SUMMARY:
Our
client is Harley-Davidson. Its stock dropped around 5% on news of declining
profits and sales. We looked at external factors first and determined that it
was more of a Harley problem rather than an industry problem.
Harley
is out of step with the two fast growing segments of the industry woman and
scooters. So, we came up with short-term and long-term strategies on both the revenue
and cost side. An example of a short-term revenue-based strategy is
offering low financing to customers. On the cost side we could refinance our
debt.
In
the long term we could produce a new bike geared towards women and younger men
and acquire scooter maker (revenue aspect). Also, on the cost side we could
hedge steel prices and have certain new parts made out of composite instead of
steel.
If Harley
follows these strategies as well as some of the others we talked about, it
should be on its way to higher profits in 24 to 36 months.
|
SHORT TERM |
LONG TERM |
REVENUE STRATEGY |
offering
low financing to customers |
produce
a new bike geared towards women and younger men and acquire scooter maker co. |
COST STRATEGY |
refinance
debt |
Hedge
steel prices and have certain new parts made out of composite instead of
steel. |
Fig:
Solution Matrix
Comments
Post a Comment